Draft 3: Summary Reader Response
In the article, “How Can Southeast
Asia’s Clean Energy Transition Be Sped Up?” Daubach (2019) proposed ways to
promote green energy production and the areas that needs to be improved in the
region. Moniz, the Chief Executive of Energy Futures Initiative and Nuclear
Threat Initiative, mentioned that the region is required to deploy a wide variety
of low carbon technologies and solutions to electricity generation in order to
reduce emissions. The author also mentioned that Singapore is a land-scarce
country that may benefit from nuclear fusion or use hydrogen as a
zero-emissions fuel for vehicles and energy storage. In addition, he reported
that the usage of coal which is the biggest source of greenhouse emissions has
increased in 2018. He added that by improving efficiency requirements will
reduce electrical consumptions. The article states that nuclear fusion may
benefit Southeast Asia. However, it is not practical for Southeast Asian
countries like Singapore to do so because it does not have a strategic
location, it’s not environmentally friendly and its expensive to build.
The selection and evaluation of a nuclear facilities site suitable for
nuclear fusion is a crucial process which can significantly affect the costs,
public acceptance, and safety of the installation. For a nuclear power reactor
to be constructed in Singapore, locating a safe site is detrimental given that
Singapore is a densely populated country, where any disaster that may occur
will disrupt the entire economy. In my opinion, given the country's
geographical size, the global standard of an adequate safety radius between the
facility and the population can never be met. It needs to have at least 30km
safety radius. Buildings, roads, houses, and economic activity are prohibited
within this radius. It is further supported in the article, 'Reconsidering
Nuclear Energy in Singapore' Phua (2016) which stated that although Fukushima
Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011 were planned and built on a strategically safe
location, nuclear tragedy still happened and that safety can never be
guaranteed.
In addition to nuclear energy production, used nuclear fuel entails
radioactivity, that its waste must meet standards and regulation to ensure
long-term safety for the environment, human health and all living things. In
the article, "Nuclear Power Trend in Southeast Asia and Its Contested
Discourses On Climate Change" Manpati (2020) stated that the downside of
nuclear power is the disposal of hazardous radioactive waste. The disposal may
take up to 50-100 years following the most common method, deep geology
disposal. This unnecessary waste will pollute the environment and may harm the
biodiversity of earth. Furthermore, researchers are still finding ways to the
most viable method to dispose nuclear waste to ensure the public safety and
health.
Nuclear energy facilities will most likely face a
cost overrun as the long-lasting construction time takes an average of 10.1
years to build. Nuclear is an expensive endeavour and makes no sense in terms
of the need to act immediately in order to mitigate the crisis of climate
change. In the article, "Nuclear Energy
Too Slow, Too Expensive To Save Climate" Reuters (2019) states that
nuclear energy cost between US$112 and US$189 to generate as compared to solar
power which ranges from US$36 to US$44 per megawatt hour. Daubach (2019)
mentioned that Moniz said Southeast Asian countries needs more innovation to
"reduce cost in power". This means that nuclear power is falling
behind to renewables in terms of cost and capacity as it was less economical and
slower to reverse carbon emissions.
Although nuclear fusion may seem to be a solution to accelerate the
transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy, not all countries have viable
requirements to implement one.
(602 Words)
References:
Manpati, T. (2020, Nov 9). Nuclear
Power Trend In Southeast Asia and Its Contested Discourses on Climate Change.
Th.Boell.
https://th.boell.org/en/2020/11/09/nuclear-power-trend-southeast-asia
Nuclear Energy Too Slow, Too Expensive
To Save Climate. (2019, Sep 24). Business Insiders.
Phua, D. (2015, Oct 26). Reconsidering
Nuclear Energy For Singapore. IPScommons.
https://ipscommons.sg/reconsidering-nuclear-energy-for-singapore/
Daubach, T. (2019, July 19). How Can
Southeast Asia’s Clean energy Transition Be Sped Up? Eco-Business.
https://www.eco-business.com/news/how-can-southeast-asias-clean-energy-transition-be-sped-up/
Comments
Post a Comment